Vol. I  ·  No. 95 Established 2026  ·  AI-Generated Daily Free to Read  ·  Free to Print

The Trilogy Times

All the news that's fit to generate  —  AI • Business • Innovation
SUNDAY, APRIL 05, 2026 Powered by Anthropic Claude  ·  Published on Klair Trilogy International © 2026
🖶 Download PDF 🖿 Print 📰 All Editions
Today's Edition

FOUNDERS FUND DROPS $220 MILLION ON CATTLE — YES, CATTLE

Peter Thiel's venture outfit bets a quarter-billion that the future of agriculture hangs around a cow's neck.

SAN FRANCISCO — Peter Thiel's Founders Fund has sunk $220 million into Halter, a New Zealand cattle-management startup that straps solar-powered collars on cows, marking the venture firm's largest agtech wager and one of the more unusual bets to come out of Sand Hill Road this year.

The collars track livestock location, health, and behavior in real time. Ranchers get a dashboard. The cows get a gentle vibration steering them away from property lines, eliminating the need for physical fencing on sprawling operations. Halter says the devices pay for themselves inside a single calving season.

Now look, this correspondent has covered semiconductor wars, billion-dollar cloud deals, and enough enterprise SaaS rounds to fill a grain silo. But a quarter-billion dollars on cow collars stops the presses for a reason. Founders Fund doesn't write checks this size on a lark. They backed SpaceX before rockets landed themselves and Palantir before governments admitted they needed it. When Thiel's outfit puts this kind of money on the table, they see a platform, not a product.

The thesis isn't hard to trace. Global cattle inventory sits north of one billion head. Most of those animals are managed with methods unchanged since barbed wire showed up in the 1870s. Precision agriculture has transformed row crops with GPS-guided tractors and satellite imagery, but livestock operations remain largely analog. Halter's pitch is that the collar is the wedge — data collection comes first, then feeding optimization, breeding analytics, and carbon tracking follow.

The round values Halter in the billions, according to sources familiar with the terms. That's steep for a company selling hardware to ranchers. But the recurring software revenue attached to each collar changes the arithmetic. Every device sold becomes a subscription. Every subscription generates data. Every data point makes the platform stickier.

Founders Fund isn't alone in sniffing opportunity in the paddock. Rival outfits have poured capital into livestock monitoring over the past eighteen months. But nobody else has landed a check this fat.

Meanwhile, across the startup landscape, the week delivered its own drama. Compliance startup Delve parted ways with Y Combinator after weeks of controversy — a rare public rupture between a portfolio company and the most recognized accelerator in the business. YC declined to detail the split. Delve issued a terse statement and went quiet.

Back in San Francisco, Anthropic announced that Claude Code subscribers will face additional charges for using the OpenClaw integration and other third-party tools — a signal that the AI tooling gold rush is entering the phase where somebody has to actually pay the freight.

But the big story today wears a solar panel and says moo. Two hundred and twenty million dollars says the connected cow is coming. Thiel is betting the ranch on it — literally.

— 30 —

Peter Thiel’s big bet on solar-powered cow collars  ·  Embattled startup Delve has ‘parted ways’ with Y Combinator  ·  Anthropic says Claude Code subscribers will need to pay extr

Two-Person Startup Hits $1.8 Billion Valuation Using AI to Replace Traditional Workforce

Medvi's extreme automation strategy raises questions about the future of corporate employment as founders run billion-dollar operation with minimal human staff.

SAN FRANCISCO — A healthcare technology company has reached a $1.8 billion valuation with just two employees, marking what may be the most extreme example yet of artificial intelligence replacing traditional corporate structures.

Medvi, founded by brothers who declined to expand their headcount beyond themselves, uses AI systems to handle functions typically performed by dozens or hundreds of workers — from customer service to software development to financial operations. The company's founders report the arrangement is "super efficient" but acknowledge it can be "a little bit lonely."

The case arrives as enterprise software operators increasingly deploy AI to compress operational costs. Trilogy International's portfolio companies have systematically automated engineering and support functions, while its Crossover platform sources remote talent at fixed global rates to handle tasks AI cannot yet perform reliably.

Medvi's structure represents a logical endpoint of this trajectory. Where Trilogy runs 75+ software companies with centralized AI-powered operations, Medvi has eliminated the operational layer entirely. The company's AI handles medical coding, claims processing, and customer interactions without human intermediaries.

The model raises immediate questions about scalability and risk concentration. Traditional enterprise software companies maintain human oversight for regulatory compliance, customer escalations, and strategic decisions. Medvi's approach assumes AI reliability across all these domains.

Industry observers note the structure also creates succession and acquisition challenges. A two-person company with no institutional knowledge transfer mechanism presents unusual due diligence problems for potential buyers. The valuation suggests investors believe the AI systems themselves constitute transferable assets, independent of their creators.

The healthcare sector's regulatory complexity makes Medvi's automation particularly notable. Medical coding requires interpretation of clinical documentation and insurance requirements — tasks historically resistant to full automation. Corti's recent release of an agentic medical coding model that claims to outperform OpenAI and Anthropic suggests the technical barriers may be falling faster than regulatory frameworks can adapt.

The $1.8 billion valuation implies annual recurring revenue between $900 million and $3.6 billion using standard SaaS multiples, though the company has not disclosed financials.

Big Banks Seeking a Piece of SpaceX’s I.P.O. Must Subscribe  ·  OpenAI Buys Streaming Show ‘TBPN,’ Aiming to Change Narrativ  ·  How A.I. Helped One Man (and His Brother) Build a $1.8 Billi

Semiconductor Supremacy: The Real Battlefield of the New Cold War

The semiconductor has become what oil was to the twentieth century: the resource that determines who leads and who follows. A wave of policy analyses underscores how artificial intelligence has ceased to be merely a technology race and become a full-scale geopolitical contest. The United States is wielding export controls on advanced chips and AI systems as diplomatic leverage, creating tiers of technological access based on alliance structures. China is building its own parallel ecosystem, while the European Union emphasizes regulation and sovereignty. Smaller nations are choosing sides or attempting to navigate between competing blocs.

The G20 has pushed back against framing AI development as an arms race, arguing for cooperative frameworks instead. However, AI capabilities are concentrating in a handful of nations with the capital, talent, and industrial base to compete. What's emerging isn't a single global AI market but a Balkanized system where access to cutting-edge models depends as much on government foreign policy as engineering budgets. The chip has become the new passport.

Haiku of the Day  ·  Claude HaikuProgress devours all
Two build empires from thin air
While earth grows hungry
The New Yorker Style  ·  Art Desk
The New Yorker Style  ·  Art Desk
The Far Side Style  ·  Art Desk
The Far Side Style  ·  Art Desk
News in Brief
Solar Cow Collars Are the New Edge AI—and Peter Thiel Just Put $220M Behind Them
AUCKLAND — Peter Thiel’s Founders Fund doesn’t drop $220 million on a novelty gadget.
Contractual Frameworks for Artificial Intelligence Systems Subject to Heightened Scrutiny Pursuant to Evolving Market Standards
NEW YORK — Pursuant to recent findings disseminated by Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP, the aforementioned legal landscape governing artificial intelligence provisions in commercial and technology contracts has undergone substantial modification, hereinafter requiring parties to address previously uncontemplated risk allocation mechanisms. The foregoing analysis, published by the firm's technology transactions practice, indicates that contracting parties are now obligated to negotiate terms addressing, inter alia, intellectual property ownership of AI-generated outputs, liability for algorithmic errors or biases, and compliance with emerging regulatory frameworks at both federal and state levels. Notwithstanding the absence of comprehensive federal legislation governing AI systems, market participants have nevertheless implemented contractual safeguards addressing data usage rights, model training restrictions, and performance warranties.
Statistical Physics Emerges as Theoretical Framework for Neural Network Analysis
PRINCETON, NEW JERSEY — It could be argued that the application of statistical-physics frameworks to neural network architectures represents a potentially transformative methodological synthesis, according to preliminary evidence emerging from recent theoretical investigations (though the epistemological implications remain contested). Researchers at the American Physical Society have articulated what might be characterized as a novel analytical lens: viewing neural networks through thermodynamic principles traditionally reserved for particle systems and phase transitions.
Nation’s Most Powerful Men Finally Solve Agriculture By Asking Cow To Submit Pull Request
SAN FRANCISCO — In a week that saw billionaires discover livestock, accelerators rediscover consequences, and AI companies rediscover the concept of “additional fees,” the technology industry made a strong case that the future will be managed by dashboards, enforced by terms of service, and paid for in confusing increments that sound smaller than they feel. The most poetic development arrived in the form of Peter Thiel’s Founders Fund deciding that the next great frontier in human progress is a cow wearing a solar-powered collar that tells an app where the cow is and what the cow is thinking about doing next.
The Crossover Economy: Why Compatibility Is the New Moat
AUSTIN, TEXAS — I’ll be honest, “crossover” used to sound like a marketing gimmick you slapped on a project when you ran out of roadmap.
A Trilogy Company
Crossover
The world's top 1% remote talent, rigorously tested and ready to ship.
A Trilogy Company
Alpha School
AI-powered learning. Two hours a day. Academic results that defy belief.
A Trilogy Company
Skyvera
Next-generation telecom software — built for the networks of tomorrow.
A Trilogy Company
Klair
Your AI-first operating system. Every workflow. Every team. One platform.
A Trilogy Company
Trilogy
We buy good software businesses and turn them into great ones — with AI.
The Portfolio  —  Trilogy Companies

ESW's Acquisition Machine Devours Four More — $462M Jive Deal Anchors Latest Buying Spree

Trilogy's private equity arm adds social software pioneer, CX analytics firm, and sales tech assets to portfolio as expansion accelerates

AUSTIN, TEXAS — ESW Capital, the enterprise software acquisition engine behind Trilogy International's portfolio empire, closed four deals in recent months that reveal the scope and velocity of its buying machine — including a $462 million acquisition of Jive Software, the once-dominant enterprise social networking platform.

Jive, which pioneered internal corporate collaboration tools before Slack and Microsoft Teams existed, joins ESW's Aurea division — a collection of 17 enterprise software brands assembled since 2012. The deal marks one of ESW's larger public acquisitions and signals continued appetite for mature enterprise platforms with sticky customer bases, even as valuations in the broader tech market remain compressed.

ESW's IgniteTech subsidiary separately absorbed multiple business intelligence and workforce management assets from Avolin, expanding its analytics footprint. Meanwhile, ESW acquired ResponseTek, a venture-backed customer experience data platform, folding it into the Skyvera telecom software portfolio alongside CloudSense and VoltDelta.

The final deal closed a chapter for XANT, a Utah-based sales engagement platform, which was quietly acquired and integrated into IgniteTech's sales automation stack.

The buying pattern is consistent: acquire at 1–2× ARR, staff with Crossover's global remote talent, push support pricing upward, and target 75% EBITDA margins — the internal benchmark ESW considers "best in class." Jive's 2,500 enterprise customers — including major financial services and healthcare firms — fit the profile perfectly: locked into mission-critical systems, unable to easily migrate, and historically undermonetized.

ESW now operates 75+ enterprise software companies across CRM, analytics, telecom, and business intelligence. The conglomerate's thesis remains unchanged: legacy enterprise software customers are sticky, and the gap between acquisition cost and extractable margin is where fortunes are made. Four more deals. Four more data points. The machine keeps running.

Jive Software Acquired by ESW Capital for $462M - CMSWire  ·  The final chapter for XANT - Utah Business  ·  Ignitetech's Enterprise Software Portfolio Expands With New

Skyvera’s Shopping Spree Gets a Salesforce Accent

CloudSense joins the telecom roll-up… and the whispers say this is less “portfolio expansion” than “platform endgame.”

AUSTIN, TEXAS — Skyvera just made it official… CloudSense is in the family… and if you’re keeping score at home, that’s another chess piece on Trilogy’s telecom board where “legacy” is just a polite word for “about to be reorganized.”

The headline move: Skyvera says it has completed the acquisition of CloudSense, a Salesforce-native CPQ and order management platform built for telecom and media providers… the kind of software that lives right in the revenue bloodstream… quoting, configuring, ordering, and making sure the dollars actually show up… Word is the pitch isn’t “nice add-on”… it’s “control the front door.” The company’s own write-up is here: Skyvera’s acquisition announcement.

And CloudSense itself? It’s not just another CPQ logo for the slide deck… it’s Salesforce-native—meaning the sales org doesn’t have to leave its comfort blanket to sell complex telco bundles… A little bird tells me that matters because telcos don’t buy new systems… they bolt them onto old ones and call it transformation. Skyvera wants the bolt-on to become the backbone. For the product specifics, Skyvera’s positioning is laid out at CloudSense.

Now zoom out… This isn’t Skyvera “dabbling.” It’s a portfolio that already reads like an operator’s survival kit—customer engagement (hello, Kandy), experience analytics, device lifecycle, the works… and now CPQ + order management moves closer to the center.

And then there’s the other acquisition breadcrumb the market shouldn’t ignore… Skyvera also snapped up STL’s telecom products group—digital BSS functionality spanning monetization, optical networking, and analytics… a tidy little basket of “things carriers hate replacing” but can’t live without. The STL divestiture note sits in plain sight on Skyvera’s site, and the subtext is louder than the copy: more surface area… more integration leverage… more pricing power.

Meanwhile, on another corner of the Trilogy universe… Alpha School is busy telling parents that private-school prestige is a pricey costume with declining outcomes… Different stage, same script: cut the waste… automate the routine… and dare the incumbents to explain what you’re paying for.

CloudSense  ·  Skyvera completes acquisition of CloudSense, expanding telec  ·  STL Divested Assets

The Résumé-Free Hiring Wars: Why Crossover's Been Playing the Long Game

As OpenAI and non-tech giants scramble to hire AI talent without traditional credentials, Trilogy's global recruiting arm has been doing it for years — and at scale.

AUSTIN, TEXAS — The tech world is having a revelation about hiring that Crossover figured out a decade ago: résumés are noise.

OpenAI made headlines this week announcing half-million-dollar roles with no résumé required — applicants prove themselves through skills assessments instead. Non-tech companies from healthcare to finance are now desperately hunting six-figure AI talent, often offering north of $300,000 for roles they barely understand. The common thread? Traditional hiring is breaking under the weight of the AI boom.

But while the industry scrambles to reinvent recruitment, Crossover — Trilogy International's global talent platform — has been running this playbook since its founding. The company claims to be the world's largest recruiter of full-time remote jobs, staffing Trilogy's 75+ enterprise software companies entirely through rigorous, AI-enabled skills assessments that deliberately minimize résumé bias.

The model works like this: candidates across 130+ countries take identical technical evaluations. Top performers get identical above-market pay regardless of geography. No résumé screening. No credential gatekeeping. Pure meritocracy at global scale.

It's how ESW Capital — Trilogy's software acquisition arm — achieves its famously aggressive 75% EBITDA margins. Replace expensive, locally-hired talent with rigorously tested global professionals who can do the same work remotely. The savings aren't about paying people less; they're about finding the best people anywhere, not just in high-cost metros.

The irony is rich. While OpenAI positions résumé-free hiring as innovation, Crossover has been doing it out of necessity — and competitive advantage. When you're staffing an empire of enterprise software companies with a distributed workforce, you can't afford to hire based on pedigree. You need to know who can actually do the work.

Now the rest of the industry is catching up. The question is whether they're ready for what comes next: not just résumé-free hiring, but geography-free compensation and truly global talent pools. Crossover's been there for years. The revolution is already running.

OpenAI Is Now Hiring $500,000 Jobs. No Resume Required - For  ·  Top recruitment agencies for remote work - hcamag.com  ·  Non-tech companies are seeking AI talent and offering 6-figu
The Machine  —  AI & Technology

The Mirror Darkens: AI and the Brain Are Converging Faster Than Anyone Expected

From macaque visual cortex to Google's research roadmap, 2025 is the year artificial intelligence stops merely imitating the brain and starts genuinely understanding it.

ATLANTA — For three and a half billion years, evolution has been running the longest experiment in information processing the universe has ever known. Now, in a handful of labs scattered across the planet, that experiment is beginning to read its own source code.

At a global AI conference this spring, researchers from Georgia Tech unveiled work on brain-inspired AI architectures that borrow not just metaphors from neuroscience, but actual computational principles — spiking dynamics, sparse coding, the elegant frugality with which biological neurons process torrents of sensory data using milliwatts of power. The approach represents a philosophical pivot: instead of brute-forcing intelligence with ever-larger transformer models, these researchers are asking what 600 million years of vertebrate brain evolution already figured out.

Meanwhile, a striking study published in neuroscience circles demonstrated that a surprisingly compact AI model can decode the visual processing of the macaque brain — predicting neural responses to images with startling fidelity. The model is small. The implications are not. If a mini-AI can map the representational geometry of a primate visual cortex, it suggests that the deep structure of biological seeing and machine seeing may share a mathematical grammar we are only beginning to parse.

This convergence is not lost on the industry's largest player. Google Research has laid out its 2025 agenda with explicit emphasis on what it calls "bolder breakthroughs" — and the neuroscience-AI intersection figures prominently. Coming on the heels of DeepMind's Nobel Prize for protein structure prediction, the company appears to be betting that the next frontier is not simply bigger models, but models that illuminate the natural world, including the organ that invented science in the first place.

What makes this moment extraordinary is the bidirectionality. AI is no longer just inspired by the brain; it is becoming a tool for understanding the brain. And the brain, in turn, is revealing design principles that make AI more efficient, more robust, more alien to the silicon-maximalist orthodoxy of recent years.

We are, in a sense, watching two forms of intelligence — one ancient, one newborn — begin to read each other's diaries. The entries are strange, and beautiful, and not yet fully translated. But the conversation has started, and it is accelerating in ways that should make every fellow traveler on this pale blue dot pay very close attention.

Google Research 2025: Bolder breakthroughs, bigger impact -  ·  Brain-Inspired AI Breakthrough Spotlighted at Global Confere  ·  Mini-AI Decodes the Macaque Visual Brain - Neuroscience News

The Quiet Bloom of AI’s Habitat: Chips, Cables, and Concrete Replace Model Megafauna

As headline-grabbing model scale plateaus, the real expansion shifts to interconnects, power gear, and the partner ecosystems that keep data centers alive.

AUSTIN, TEXAS — In the understory of the AI rainforest, where attention once fixated on the largest and loudest creatures—ever-bigger foundation models—something subtler now stirs. The canopy still rustles with breakthroughs, yes. But the most reliable growth is happening on the forest floor: in the plumbing.

Observe the interconnect. Not glamorous, rarely photographed, yet utterly decisive. NVIDIA’s latest ecosystem push—NVLink Fusion and the widening circle of companies that benefit from its gravitational pull—signals a familiar pattern in nature: once a dominant species establishes territory, entire symbiotic communities form around it. Investors, ever the patient trackers, have begun to follow the cables rather than the algorithms.

That is why alliances like NVIDIA and Marvell have drawn fresh scrutiny. Marvell’s specialty—high-speed networking, custom silicon, and the connective tissue between compute islands—sits exactly where modern AI clusters feel pain: data must move, and it must move fast, with tolerable heat and tolerable cost. The market framing is blunt but accurate: AI data center growth is increasingly a story of throughput, not just teraflops. Even the financial press, peering through binoculars, is emphasizing this shift (as the Nvidia–Marvell alliance comes into focus).

Meanwhile, Siemens is expanding its data center partner ecosystem—an industrial migration toward standardized, scalable designs for next-generation facilities. In plain terms: power distribution, cooling, building management, and automation—the organs of the beast—are being organized into repeatable supply chains (per Siemens’ own announcement).

And in the distance, a curious observation: talk of truly gigantic new models has quieted. The megafauna are still there—but fewer fresh footprints. Efficiency, data quality, and deployment constraints increasingly govern survival.

The implication is almost serene. AI’s next compounding phase may belong less to the spectacle of model size, and more to the patient, persistent builders of the habitat itself.

Nvidia Marvell Alliance Puts AI Data Center Growth In Sharpe  ·  Siemens expands data center partner ecosystem to scale next-  ·  5 Stocks That Win Big From NVIDIA’s NVLink Fusion AI Ecosyst
The Editorial

Nation’s Most Powerful Men Finally Solve Agriculture By Asking Cow To Submit Pull Request

Between solar collars, tool surcharges, and a startup getting uninvited from its own accelerator, Silicon Valley continues its steady march toward turning everything into a subscription that can be revoked.

SAN FRANCISCO — In a week that saw billionaires discover livestock, accelerators rediscover consequences, and AI companies rediscover the concept of “additional fees,” the technology industry made a strong case that the future will be managed by dashboards, enforced by terms of service, and paid for in confusing increments that sound smaller than they feel.

The most poetic development arrived in the form of Peter Thiel’s Founders Fund deciding that the next great frontier in human progress is a cow wearing a solar-powered collar that tells an app where the cow is and what the cow is thinking about doing next. Founders Fund’s $220 million investment in Halter, a cattle management startup, suggests that the firm has concluded the most scalable way to fix the world is to wrap it in hardware and wait for recurring revenue to happen. As reported by TechCrunch, the wager is not merely that cows can be made more efficient, but that a previously analog animal can be upgraded into a remotely configurable endpoint.

It is, in its way, a tender story: an industry that has spent decades trying to turn humans into product finally finding a customer base that will not tweet through the onboarding process. Cows do not complain on X. Cows do not write Medium posts about founder mode. Cows do not insist the collar is “surveillance.” Cows simply stand there, like perfect enterprise buyers, waiting patiently for the next firmware update.

Of course, the cow-collar bet is only the appetizer in a broader movement toward “Everything As A Service, Including Your Ability To Continue Existing In The Program.” That theme was further clarified when Anthropic informed Claude Code subscribers that using its coding assistant with OpenClaw and other third-party tools will now cost extra. The move, covered by TechCrunch, is a helpful reminder that AI is not replacing software pricing models so much as perfecting them: the same fee structure as before, but now with a personality.

In the old world, developers paid for IDEs, plugins, and cloud services. In the new world, they will pay for the privilege of asking the machine to open the toolbox, then pay again for the machine to touch the tools, and finally pay a convenience fee for the machine to look meaningfully into the middle distance and say, “I can do that,” before producing code that confidently compiles in an alternate reality.

Meanwhile, the compliance startup Delve has reportedly “parted ways” with Y Combinator, a phrase that preserves everyone’s dignity by refusing to specify whether anyone screamed, cried, or simply sent a calendar invite titled “Separation: Mutual.” According to TechCrunch, controversy appears to have finally cost Delve its association with the accelerator—an outcome that will shock anyone who believed the technology industry’s preferred compliance strategy was to build a company around it and then act surprised when asked to demonstrate it.

Taken together, these stories form a coherent philosophy: the future is controlled access. A cow is guided by a collar that is guided by a platform. A developer is guided by an assistant that is guided by a pricing page. A startup is guided by an accelerator until the accelerator decides it is not.

Silicon Valley likes to talk about “alignment,” and it has achieved it at last—not between humans and AI, but between business models and the unchanging truth that every living thing, from a founder to a cow, is most valuable when it can be monitored, billed, and, if necessary, offboarded.

Peter Thiel’s big bet on solar-powered cow collars  ·  Embattled startup Delve has ‘parted ways’ with Y Combinator  ·  Anthropic says Claude Code subscribers will need to pay extr
The Office Comic  ·  Art Desk
The Office Comic  ·  Art Desk

Silicon Valley's Conformity Problem Is Not a Bug — It's the Whole Machine

When a former Meta president and a chorus of critics all say the same thing about the Valley's groupthink, the irony writes itself.

SAN FRANCISCO — There is a particular species of comedy, unimprovable by any satirist, that arises when a dozen voices simultaneously denounce conformity in identical language. We are living through such a moment in Silicon Valley, and I confess it brings me something close to joy.

Nick Clegg, the former British deputy prime minister who spent years as Meta's president of global affairs — which is to say, years explaining away the inexplicable on behalf of Mark Zuckerberg — has now emerged from that experience to call Silicon Valley "cloyingly conformist." One supposes it takes a man who sat through a thousand all-hands meetings about "moving fast and breaking things" to recognize the scent of intellectual monoculture. That he noticed only after cashing out is, of course, the Valley way.

But Clegg is merely the most credentialed voice in a growing chorus. Writers are daring to criticize the technology establishment and finding, to their apparent surprise, that the establishment does not take it well. The 996 work culture — nine in the morning to nine at night, six days a week, a schedule imported from Shenzhen's hardware factories and now metastasizing through American startups — has employees murmuring their discontent, though naturally they murmur it anonymously, on platforms built by the very companies that demand the hours.

What none of these critics quite say, because it would require a degree of self-examination uncomfortable even for the confessional age, is that Silicon Valley's conformity is not incidental to its success but constitutive of it. The entire apparatus — the pitch decks, the board meetings, the breathless product launches, the theological certainty that whatever is being built will "change the world" — requires unanimity the way a church requires faith. Doubt is not merely unwelcome; it is structurally impossible. You cannot raise a Series B on ambivalence.

I have watched this dynamic for years from my perch covering Trilogy International's portfolio, and I will say this for Joe Liemandt's operation: it has never pretended to be a democracy of ideas. When you acquire seventy-five enterprise software companies, strip them to their recurring revenue, and run them through a global talent machine like Crossover, you are not hosting a Socratic dialogue. You are running a business. The honesty is refreshing. It is the companies that insist they are changing human consciousness while enforcing a 996 schedule that deserve our particular contempt.

The deeper problem, which the critics now circling have begun to sense but not yet articulate, is that artificial intelligence — the industry's latest and most potent article of faith — amplifies every pathology of the culture that built it. A technology sector that cannot tolerate dissent is now building systems designed to synthesize consensus at planetary scale. The 996 grind that burns out human engineers will soon be rendered moot by AI agents that never sleep, never complain, and never write tell-all memoirs after leaving the C-suite.

Silicon Valley has not lost its way, as the more sentimental commentators would have it. It has arrived, with terrible efficiency, exactly where its logic always pointed: a place where conformity is the product, the process, and the price of admission. The only novelty is that people have finally started to say so — all of them, remarkably, at the same time, in the same words, with the same tone of wounded discovery. The irony, as I said, writes itself.

The Writer Who Dared Criticize Silicon Valley - The New York  ·  The Rise of the 996 Work Culture Has Employees Concerned in  ·  Former Meta executive Nick Clegg calls Silicon Valley 'cloyi
On This Day in AI History

On April 5, 2016, Google's AlphaGo defeated Lee Sedol 4-1 in a five-game match of Go in Seoul, marking a watershed moment when AI conquered a game long considered beyond machine reach due to its astronomical complexity.

⬛ Daily Word — Technology
Hint: Relating to computers and the internet, often used in security contexts.
Share this edition: 𝕏 Twitter/X 🔗 Copy Link ▦ RSS Feed